[Massplanners] Development Standards for "Missing Middle" Housing?

[B]

Taunton would be interested also.

Including traditional two family units in older neighborhoods ,any have a
door or two in the from right next to each other on a shared porch.

This as opposed to what,we call condexes. Seem to sell pretty well. Not
cheap though.

These condexes typically have widely separate entrances with small covers.
Garage doors take up a good portion of what is seen from the street.
Separate driveways and lawn as such as they are.

There seems little issues with the density.  It more having some design
guidance that fits better with the infill type buildings.

Thanks

Bill Fitzgerald
Taunton Planning Board. (Writing for myself)



On Wed, Apr 3, 2024, 12:55 PM Maren Toohill via MassPlanners <
massplanners at masscptc.org> wrote:

> Hi All –
>
> It’s (still) all about MBTA Communities.
>
> Please share any development standards for the “smaller” end of the
> Missing Middle Housing unit types: duplexes to 12-unit Townhouses.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Maren
>
>
>
> Maren A. Toohill, AICP
>
> Town Planner
>
> 978/540-2425
>
> MToohill at littletonma.org
>
> Town of Littleton
> --
> MassPlanners mailing list
> MassPlanners at masscptc.org
> http://masscptc.org/mailman/listinfo/massplanners_masscptc.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://masscptc.org/pipermail/massplanners_masscptc.org/attachments/20240404/ff975022/attachment.htm>