<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>The ownership in fee would seem to be the real hurdle. To me that ownership in fee would be treated just like a road dividing the property into two separate lots. The ROW might allow for the creation of an access road to the back land by subdivision. Not sure it could work as a panhandle.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Now, as Byron notes, the nature of the right to cross can be a big issue. Years ago, when in NH, I had to deal with this with the Boston and Maine. They absolutely refused to allow at-grade crossings due to safety (track was then slow ordered to 15 mph max). </p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So, a lot of questions that would challenge the idea of viable access for a building permit without the input from legal counsel. I would start by having the property owner provide a legal justification for the idea that he has legal access and a buildable lot, then pass that on to Town Counsel for review and confirmation.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Dan Fortier</p><p class=MsoNormal>Dennis Town Planner (Interim)</p><p class=MsoNormal>Retired</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Sent from <a href="https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986">Mail</a> for Windows</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0in'><b>From: </b><a href="mailto:massplanners@masscptc.org">Doug Albertson via MassPlanners</a><br><b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, July 5, 2022 11:34 AM<br><b>To: </b><a href="mailto:massplanners@masscptc.org">massplanners@masscptc.org</a><br><b>Subject: </b>[Massplanners] Land separated by RR</p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Hi experts and observers,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I know the answer but want to see if any of you has an alternative truth. The property owner’s house has adequate frontage and area. Behind it is the railroad owned in fee by the RR. Then the owner’s next property of 35 acres with no frontage. There is an existing RoW crossing over the RR between the two. The owner wants to know, of course, if he can create a building lot for his daughter on the rear parcel. The first one of you who responds with “You’ve been doing this for 30 years and you have to ask?!?” is removed from my will. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Are there any particular insights regarding railroad properties that would add radical variables to what should be an outright “no”? <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Doug<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Douglas Albertson<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Town Planner<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Town of Belchertown<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>P.O. Box 670<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Belchertown, Mass. 01007<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>(413) 323-0407 ext. 320<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>