<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">The only basic decision being made by way of an Approval Not Required is that the lot has adequate access across its frontage. As the developer now wants to argue that an easement is needed for access, the Building Commissioner should
reject the Building Permit request and direct the property owner to seek a variance or approval of a Subdivision with appropriate road access. As the ANR basically presented to the Board that the access was adequate, the Zoning Board should reject the variance
request as it would contradict the basis for the ANR to begin with.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Daniel J. Fortier, AICP<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Town Planner<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dennis Planning Department<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">685 Route 134<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">South Dennis MA 02660<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Phone 508-760-6119<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">dfortier@town.dennis.ma.us<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> MassPlanners <massplanners-bounces@masscptc.org>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Gisela Walker via MassPlanners<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, February 9, 2022 11:13 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> MassPlanners@masscptc.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Massplanners] 3 ANRs and 'easement by necessity'<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In 2008 the P Bd approved three ANRs, all having proper lot size and barely enough frontage.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Now the owner wants to sell them as building lots, and tells us that because of steep banks only one lot can provide access to the other two. His plan shows a curvy short driveway that touches all three lots and he requests an easement
for this shared driveway.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">He quotes " ... your agreement could be based on an <u>“easement by necessity”, which is documented in the Mass General Laws.</u> ..., it states that a legal easement can exist if it is absolutely necessary to cross someone’s land for
a legitimate purpose, i.e., access to their home”<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In his sample easement agreement he also reserves the right for future subdivision of the lots. <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">It seems like a half-baked way to start. Can we at least request that the shared driveway be built to minimum subdivision standards?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Gisela Walker<br>
24 Windy Hill Road<br>
Shelburne Falls MA 01370<br>
413-625-2401 <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
<html><body></i></b><p><br>
This electronic message is confidential and intended for the named recipient only. Any dissemination, disclosure or distribution of the contents of this communication is unlawful and prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by return email or telephone and delete the copy you received. Thank you. </p></body></html>