[Massplanners] Starter Homes M.G.L c40Y Draft Regulations Public Comment Period

[Judi Barrett]

I agree completely, Wayne. People don’t understand how to evaluate the fiscal impact of new housing or any other land use. If planners have trouble figuring this out, I don’t know how we can expect local officials to understand, let alone the general public.

Judi Barrett
BARRETT PLANNING GROUP LLC
350 Lincoln Street, Ste. 2503
Hingham, MA 02043
Office: (781) 934-0073, x7
Cell: (781) 206-6045


From: Wayne Feiden <wayne at feiden.org>
Date: Friday, June 20, 2025 at 10:43
To: Jeff Lacy <ruralplanningassociates at crocker.com>
Cc: Harry LaCortiglia <hlacortiglia at comcast.net>, "judi at barrettplanningllc.com" <judi at barrettplanningllc.com>, MassPLanners MassPLanners CPTC <massplanners at masscptc.org>
Subject: Re: [Massplanners] Starter Homes M.G.L c40Y Draft Regulations Public Comment Period

Jeff identifies where a lot of opposition to affordable and attainable housing comes from, even in spite of the overwhelming social and economic need for such housing.

I will point out, however, that while the American Farmland Trust (AFT) identified the high cost of residential development, they used a average cost approach. When the Citizens Housing and Planning Association (CHAPA) did a similar analysis, specifically of multi-family housing, they used a marginal cost approach, which resulted in very different outcomes. New housing rarely creates the need for a new city hall, fire station, police station, etc, so the marginal cost from new housing is much lower.

Wayne Feiden FAICP


On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:27 AM Jeff Lacy via MassPlanners <massplanners at masscptc.org<mailto:massplanners at masscptc.org>> wrote:
Fundamental rub with lower-priced housing, technically “affordable” or not, is fiscal. Cities and towns are principally concerned with making their budgets work without overrides and revolts. Their principal obligations are to provide essential services and infrastructure that residents expect and retaining an experienced high-quality workforce.

The American Farmland Trust some decades back did a “Costs of Community Services” study in New England that looked at various land uses, what local government services they demanded, and how much they contributed in property taxes toward those services. Commercial, industrial, and open space all demanded less than they contributed. Residential, as a category, demanded more than contributed. But the residential results were a mixed bag, with an assessed value cutoff between the homes that covered their costs (higher assessed values) and those that did not (lower assessed values).

For the AFT the takeaway was that, as a category, open farmland not only exerted fewer demands upon municipal services, but actually subsidized residential. So keeping those lands from being residentially subdivided made dollars and sense. For municipalities, the takeaway was that, fiscally, if there’s a given family of four in a house, it’s better for the town that the house have a higher assessed value (to better pay for the same service demands, education in particular).

This tension between a societal need and a fiscal reality is the point I think Harry is making.

Jeff Lacy
Rural Planning Associates
896 Graves Road
Conway, MA 01341
(413) 230-9693 (cell)
ruralplanningassociates at crocker.com<mailto:ruralplanningassociates at crocker.com>


From: MassPlanners <massplanners-bounces at masscptc.org<mailto:massplanners-bounces at masscptc.org>> On Behalf Of Harry LaCortiglia via MassPlanners
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2025 6:34 AM
To: Judi Barrett <judi at barrettplanningllc.com<mailto:judi at barrettplanningllc.com>>
Cc: massplanners at masscptc.org<mailto:massplanners at masscptc.org>
Subject: Re: [Massplanners] Starter Homes M.G.L c40Y Draft Regulations Public Comment Period


Since we're currently at 11.4 % Affordable on the SHI it's a safe bet that the Town recognizes the inherent value in affordability, Judi.

The challenge to adopting new districts at town meeting in this community can often come down to framing the argument in beneficial monetary terms.

Years ago our attempt at a 40R adoption failed by only 2 votes at Town Meeting. By the time we were ready to try adoption again at a subsequent Town Meeting, the State's incentive funding had dried up.

We lost the carrot.

Not surprisingly, we do not have a 40R District.

In the aftermath of a contentious MBTA 3A adoption, until the bruises fade, the passing of new Zoning Amendments will now entail getting the citizens to forget the stick EOHLC used to achieve MBTA 3A adoption, and focusing more on the potential carrots that the town may receive.

We just went through a Prop 2&1/2 override, so carrot$ could be very helpful.
Best,
H. LaCortiglia
Georgetown P.B.


It seems to me the best incentive is getting some affordably priced housing!
[Image removed by sender.]
Judi Barrett
(she, her, hers)
Barrett Planning Group LLC
350 Lincoln Street, Ste 2503
Hingham, MA 02043
(p) 781-934-0073
(c) 781-206-6045


On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 6:37 AM Harry LaCortiglia via MassPlanners <massplanners at masscptc.org<mailto:massplanners at masscptc.org>> wrote:

Thank you Filipe,

The link you provided states that "Massachusetts offers incentives and technical assistance for towns and cities to create these districts."

Could you elaborate with respect to the incentives for towns?
Best,
H. LaCortiglia
Georgetown P.B.


On 6/18/2025 3:19 PM, Zamborlini, Filipe (EOHLC) via MassPlanners wrote:
Dear MassPlanners,

The Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities (EOHLC) is pleased to announce the opening of the public comment period for the Starter Home/Chapter 40Y regulations. We welcome your continued feedback on these draft regulations during the public comment period that starts on June 20, 2025 and closes on July 25, 2025. Submit a comment at www.mass.gov/starterhomes<http://www.mass.gov/starterhomes>. We anticipate that final regulations will be effective in the early fall.

Thank you,
Filipe

Filipe Zamborlini (he/him/his)
Manager, Community Assistance Unit
Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities (EOHLC)
Livable Communities Division
100 Cambridge Street, Suite 300
Boston, MA  02114
filipe.zamborlini at mass.gov<mailto:filipe.zamborlini at mass.gov>

[Image removed by sender.]<https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/b4eb39dbb6b34b3fb6d841ec0fdb7916@mass.gov?anonymous&ep=signature>
Book time to meet with me<https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/b4eb39dbb6b34b3fb6d841ec0fdb7916@mass.gov?anonymous&ep=signature>



--
MassPlanners mailing list
MassPlanners at masscptc.org<mailto:MassPlanners at masscptc.org>
http://masscptc.org/mailman/listinfo/massplanners_masscptc.org
--
MassPlanners mailing list
MassPlanners at masscptc.org<mailto:MassPlanners at masscptc.org>
http://masscptc.org/mailman/listinfo/massplanners_masscptc.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://masscptc.org/pipermail/massplanners_masscptc.org/attachments/20250620/6c12539f/attachment.htm>