[Massplanners] what is a minor change to a Special Permit

[Star Atkeson]

Thank you everyone for the very informative replies. Our Chair has a related question—we have, in the past, had a case where a new business has taken over the space of a previously permitted business that ran with the property. They followed the original conditions of the special permit in regards to lighting, hours, sign size, parking, but the business was different. In our case it was a sports shop that became a smoke shop, so it continued to be retail, (it got the required licenses etc from BOH and whatever other agencies require them) and in this case the owner was the same. The Planning Board back then was told by the zoning enforcement officer that a new special permit was not needed (hence no new hearing.)Members of our PB believe that changing the business is a substantial change, and we often hear/use the phrase "change of use." Is change of use not a planning Board issue? Or is retail retail, restaurant is a restaurant and within those uses there can be change as long as all the conditions of the original permit are followed?

Thanks so much,

Star
Charlemont Secretary to the Boards
________________________________
From: ruralplanningassociates at crocker.com <ruralplanningassociates at crocker.com>
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2024 10:17 AM
To: 'Town Planner' <townplanner at wnewbury.org>; Star Atkeson <Star.Atkeson at townofcharlemont.org>; massplanners at masscptc.org <massplanners at masscptc.org>
Subject: RE: [Massplanners] what is a minor change to a Special Permit


Hi, Star:



Perhaps it’s evident by now that modification of the special permit in a substantive way triggers a return run-through of the original process. The advice that Dan Fortier gave a few days ago sounds wise to me. Leave the special permit in place but enact stricter restrictions via the board of health. Never mind what the special permit allows, the stricter restriction will control.



Best,



Jeff Lacy

Rural Planning Associates

896 Graves Road

Conway, MA 01341

ruralplanningassociates at crocker.com

(413) 230-9693







From: MassPlanners <massplanners-bounces at masscptc.org> On Behalf Of Town Planner via MassPlanners
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 8:01 AM
To: Star Atkeson <Star.Atkeson at townofcharlemont.org>; massplanners at masscptc.org
Subject: Re: [Massplanners] what is a minor change to a Special Permit



Hi Star,

If you are amending a condition of a special permit (or creating a new condition), I would view that as a substantive change (major).



It’s a good idea to list all the changes the board will deem “non-substantive” in the decision to make it clear what will require a public hearing in the future.  Items included in past decisions I have been involved with are:  small changes to the site plan, shifts in layout, changes in landscaping materials, etc.



Good luck.



Katrina O’Leary  ,AICP

Town Planner

West Newbury

townplanner at wnewbury.org<mailto:townplanner at wnewbury.org>

(978) 363-1100 x125

M-W, 7AM-3PM







From: MassPlanners <massplanners-bounces at masscptc.org<mailto:massplanners-bounces at masscptc.org>> On Behalf Of Star Atkeson via MassPlanners
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2024 3:11 PM
To: massplanners at masscptc.org<mailto:massplanners at masscptc.org>
Subject: [Massplanners] what is a minor change to a Special Permit



Hello Planners,



We have a wedding venue in town who wants the Planning Board to amend their special permit to limit the number of events, as a (previously agreed) way to satisfy the Board of Health, that they do not need to be a public water supply. The change would be a sentence limiting the number of events to 60 per year, they currently only do about 20 anyways. There would be a second minor change to the specific public water supply condition in the permit.



Would you consider this a minor change, since nothing would tangibly be changing at the venue except they wouldn't need to use bottled water? Or is it a significant change, since it is stipulated by another board who seems to be looking for a legal document.



The applicant does not want to do the hearing process. In other recent Planning Board business we have held hearings for similar minor changes on more controversial situations, so on one hand we want to be consistent, on the other, if it is legal to go for it without the hearing, that is what the applicant would like.



Thank you for your advice,

Star





Star Atkeson

Secretary to The Boards

Town of Charlemont

(413) 339-4335 ex.8


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://masscptc.org/pipermail/massplanners_masscptc.org/attachments/20241220/c9faa4a1/attachment.htm>