[Massplanners] Zoning Board case - constructive approval

Harry LaCortiglia hlacortiglia at comcast.net
Wed Jun 28 07:04:00 EDT 2023


I'm not an APA-MA member... Is there any chance that a Planning Board 
member such as myself, might be able to access that resource? (Any 
bootleg copies available?)

H. LaCortiglia
Georgetown Planning Board



On 6/26/2023 11:38 AM, ruralplanningassociates--- via MassPlanners wrote:
>
> By the way, MA planners, the answers to this and many, many questions 
> that come up in the course of running our planning offices can be 
> found in “The Guidebook to Massachusetts Land Use,” written by Bob 
> Mitchell and Bob Ritchie. It’s available to any APA-MA member. A 
> tremendous resource!
>
> Jeff lacy
>
> Rural Planning Associates
>
> (413) 230-9693
>
> *From:* Jeff Lacy <ruralplanningassociates at crocker.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, June 26, 2023 7:47 AM
> *To:* Bob Mitchell <mitchellfaicp at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Stephen Wallace <swallace at sterling-ma.gov>; 
> massplanners at masscptc.org; Bill Caldwell <bcaldwell at sterling-ma.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: [Massplanners] Zoning Board case - constructive approval
>
> Thanks, Bob, for the more complete answer.
>
> Jeff Lacy
>
> Rural Planning Associates
>
> (413) 230-9693
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
>     On Jun 25, 2023, at 8:57 PM, Bob Mitchell via MassPlanners
>     <massplanners at masscptc.org> wrote:
>
>     
>
>     Stephen: There seems to be a number of issues in the special
>     permit situation in your email, one of which Jeff has addressed. A
>     few comments:
>
>     a) As Jeff noted, after the close of the public hearing the board
>     has ninety days to take final action, final action being the
>     making of the decision, the vote on the decision, and the filing
>     of the written decision with the town clerk. The board is
>     required to file its written decision within 14 days of making the
>     decision and the 14 days has to occur within the 90 day time
>     period. Some boards make and vote on the decision within the
>     context of the public hearing and close the hearing after the
>     vote. Other boards close the public hearing and then deliberate
>     and vote on a decisioni at a subsequent public meeting (not
>     a public hearing). Either way, the 14 day clock starts from the
>     date of the vote on the decision.
>
>     b) There are  a number of court decisions that clarify what
>     modifications a board may make in its decision after having made
>     the decision. The  most important distinction the courts have
>     noted is that a board may make clerical corrections at a
>     subsequent public meeting. However, if the modification is
>     substantive and changes the result of the original decision, then
>     the only way for the board to modify the original decision is to
>     go through a new special permit process (public notice, notice to
>     abutters, public hearing etc.). Is changing the number of units
>     allowed by the decisions substantive? The town needs to answer
>     that question.
>
>     c) As for a constructive grant, there is a defined procedure that
>     the applicant would have to go through in order to claim
>     constructive grant, starting with filing such a claim after the 90
>     days from the close of the hearing expire without a decision being
>     filed with the town clerk. If this procedure is followed and the
>     applicant receives a constructive grant certificate from the town
>     clerk, the constructive grant is based on the original plans
>     submitted by the applicant. There would be no board review, no
>     changes to those plans, and no conditions on those plans.
>
>     Bob Mitchell FAICP
>
>     Planning Consultant
>
>     Land Use, Planning, Zoning, & Training Programs
>
>     151 Tremont Street Suite 23A
>
>     Boston, MA 02111
>
>     617-512-9751 (c)
>
>     MitchellFAICP at gmail.com
>
>     On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:20 AM Stephen Wallace via MassPlanners
>     <massplanners at masscptc.org> wrote:
>
>         Questions on constructive approval. Here goes….
>
>         _The Situation: _Our Zoning Board voted to approve a Special
>         Permit for a multi-family development. Before the decision was
>         filed, the Board believed that they had made a mistake on the
>         calculation on how many units were allowed under the bylaw.
>         The Board wanted to amend the approval and correct the number
>         of units.  (Which is allowed per MGL 40A Section 14).  The
>         Town obtained an opinion from Counsel that they may correct
>         the decision, but it must be done at a public meeting and it
>         had to be done with 14 days of the close of the public hearing.
>
>         The Board, being unable to meet within the 14 days has decided
>         to refuse to sign the decision and allow constructive
>         approval. According to Bobrowski, the SPGA must take "final
>         action" within 90 days from the date of the close of the
>         public hearing.  And the "14 days" shall be part of the 90
>         days but not beyond the 90 days.  This seems to contradict
>         what our counsel stated that "final action" was to take place
>         14 days from the close of hearing.
>
>         _Questions: _Has anyone had a Board refuse to sign a decision
>         that they approved?  Do you have any thoughts on how to handle
>         the constructive approval?  If the Board refuses to sign and
>         allow constructive approval to take over, does the decision
>         they negotiated go away and the original application get approved?
>
>         Stephen Wallace
>
>         Town Planner
>
>         Phone: 978-422-8111,  Extension 2320
>
>         Email: swallace at sterling-ma.gov <mailto:swallace at sterling-ma.gov>
>
>         Butterick Municipal Building
>
>         1 Park Street
>
>         Room 202
>
>         Sterling, MA 01564
>
>         When writing or responding, please be aware that the
>         Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth has determined
>         that most email is a public record and, therefore, may not be
>         kept confidential.  However, the preceding email message
>         (including any attachments) contains information that may,
>         under specific circumstances, be confidential, may be
>         protected by law or other applicable privileges, or may
>         constitute non-public information. It is intended to be
>         conveyed only to the designated recipient(s) named above. If
>         you are not an intended recipient of this message, please
>         notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete
>         all copies of it from your computer system. Any use,
>         dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message
>         by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>
>         -- 
>         MassPlanners mailing list
>         MassPlanners at masscptc.org
>         http://masscptc.org/mailman/listinfo/massplanners_masscptc.org
>
>     -- 
>     MassPlanners mailing list
>     MassPlanners at masscptc.org
>     http://masscptc.org/mailman/listinfo/massplanners_masscptc.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://masscptc.org/pipermail/massplanners_masscptc.org/attachments/20230628/0d1723ce/attachment.htm>


More information about the MassPlanners mailing list